Skip to content
Home » ProtonMail vs Tutanota

ProtonMail vs Tutanota

  • by


Email services have come a long way from the early 1990s when privacy and security took a backseat to features and convenience. However, with growing digital threats such as hacking, spoofing, spamming and surveillance, the demand for private and secure email has exploded.

Two Europe-based email providers at the forefront of this movement are ProtonMail and Tutanota. Both utilize end-to-end encryption to protect message contents from prying eyes. Neither has the ability to access or share user emails or data with third parties.

In this comprehensive comparison guide, we analyze the critical differences between ProtonMail and Tutanota across key aspects such as privacy protections, security protocols, features, storage allowances, pricing models, ease of use and customer support.

Identifying the pros and cons allow subscribers to determine the ideal encrypted email provider aligning with personal or professional operational requirements when managing sensitive communications online.

Privacy & Security

As privacy and security form the core value propositions for both ProtonMail and Tutanota tasked with shielding communication content and user data from exploitation, we assess their approaches:

Privacy – Data Collection Policies

Both providers operate strict no-logging policies regarding user activity and strictly limit retention of personally identifiable information to aspects like customer email addresses required for delivering services subscribed.

However, Tutanota maintains a slight edge through utilizing anonymous payment options by default for all financial transactions providing better purchasing anonymity. ProtonMail logs billing details facilitating recurring subscription charges unless users consciously enable crypto payment options manually post-signup.

For business accounts, Tutanota also enables anonymous encrypted email aliases allowing communication without exposing company domain names publicly. ProtonMail lacks similar native alias assignment capabilities currently requiring establishing distinct accounts instead less convenient operationally.

Security – Encryption Standards

  • ProtonMail utilizes OpenPGP and AES standards ensuring all encrypted emails stored on servers remain locked using public-private key architecture without provider access theoretically guaranteeing exclusive owner control and access always. However, emails sent to outside non-ProtonMail recipients rely on comparatively weaker transport layer security during external transmission phases potentially until recipients digitally sign and initialize communication threads although technically challenging realistically for mass adoption forcing reliance still on base TLS methods adopted by competing providers more universally over past decade across all sending scenarios as de-facto norms already.
  • Tutanota exclusively utilizes AES 128-bit to AES 256-bit encryption authenticated with 2048-bit RSA signatures across entire mail delivery chain regardless of recipient email platform specifics allowing theoretically safer global encrypted transmissions security wise by default universally out the door always. However lacks integrating PGP support hampering abilities verifying public key fingerprints establishing trust with first time recipients externally something ProtonMail facilitates through ease relatively at individual level.

So ProtonMail supports best industry practices using hybrid models allowing flexibility options depending specific business use cases and recipient technical capabilities while Tutanota focuses purely on consistency aspects alone regardless who receives communications at other end universally leveling bases somewhat when collaborating externally beyond company firewalls but internal risks persist lacking mature PGP global support decades later somehow still despite wishful tech projections predicting mass adoptions arriving any year decades passively optimistically going unmaterialized largely among consumers audiences guarding privacy rather casually otherwise unless regulated forcibly.

Which works best depends specific situations and individual judgement calls warranting case-by-case evaluations assessing what type communications get conducted at what frequencies using which methods and which parties remain involved on daily basis realistically before determining ideal configurations suiting respective customer needs contextually. Absolute judgments therefore prove unrealistic beyond limited feature comparisons alone understating complex contextual usage and adoption challenges greatly at mass market levels among audiences historically conditioned trusting convenience over security tradeoffs perpetually somehow instinctively against better knowledge or worse intentions deliberately despite Maturity warranting prudence certainly during increasingly turbulent epochs already enduring early stages even now. Rarely choices boil down so conveniently between such meme worthy binaries ultimately.

Features Comparison

Besides security, supporting features allows conveying additional utilities attracting wider customer segments to privacy preserving platforms beyond just niche audiences worried about fundamental encryption support alone historically speaking:

| ProtonMail | Tutanota |


|Custom email aliases|No native support|

|Mail labels for organization| Only two label options for automation rules|

|Multi-user support with folders| No shared labels or folders natively|

|Dark mode, multiple inbox themes |Lacks extra visual personalization|

|native iOS, Android, desktop apps|Missing native mobile apps so far|

|Address encryption for recipients| End-to-end auto encryption for all recipients by default|

|OpenPGP and S/MIME support|Automatic encryption regardless of recipient tech capabilities|

|Easier email import tool|Tricks importing external emails into Tutanota platform|

Therefore, while Tutanota focuses narrowly on strengthening automatic encryption breadth reaching all recipient endpoints universally by default without exceptions, ProtonMail leads supporting additional utilities through accomodating alias management, theming personalization, external contacts importation and standards like PGP/S-MIME catering power user storage, sorting and encryption preferences more granularly off the bat.

However, Tutanota’s web-only access remains simple benefiting users worried about maintaining additional native apps constantly updated fueling subscriptions models most software vendors monetize aggressively to survive competitively today. So ultimately use case priorities determine ideal selections catering specific customer journeys accordingly more than unilateral feature checkmark tallies alone superficially without accommodating steep adoption reality barriers facing encrypted communications landscape still maturing gradually among mainstream audiences conservatively.

Storage Allowances

With inboxes filling quicker through enlarging email attachment sizes and retention duration spanning decades almost as digital archival records for both personal and professional use cases with passing lifetimes across generational divides – storage limitations dominate planning decisions balancing affordability tradeoffs constraining adoption budgets for privacy tools also we evaluate respectively in tiered offerings context from both providers next additionally eclipsing simply security standards assessments alone:

Free Premium Professional Visionary
ProtonMail Storage 500MB $28/yr for 5GB $48/r for 5GB $288/yr for 20GB
Tutanota Storage 1GB €36/yr for 10GB €60/yr for 30GB €120/yr unlimited
Max Storage Allowance 0.5GB 20GB/ProtonMail 30GB/Tutanota No limits for Tutanota
Approx. Emails Stored 2500 100,000 150,000 Unlimited capacity

Summary Analysis

  1. Base tier generosities remain evenly split offering 500MB(Proton) and 1GB(Tutanota) magnitudes sufficient securing enterprise mail demands from small business and medical practice groups lacking voluminous attachments archive needs moving forwards. However growth constraints surface for advanced professional use groups juggling multimedia communications globally across interlinked organizational matrices cross regions internationally daily as complex project interchanges scale enterprise messaging loads correspondingly.
  2. Mid tier ProtonMail solutions undercut at $28/year for 5GB roughly versus Tutanota costing €36/year for 10GB equivalents. However ProtonMail sporting 6x storage capacity capabilities adjusting $288/year pricing unlocks greater expansion room than Tutanota managing 30GB peaks capped so regarding messaging loads suiting multinational corporations and institutional communication needs harboring legal compliance archival requirements with advanced notice retrieval necessities.
  3. Visionary tier long term considerations give Tutanota decisive infinite messaging advantages against fixed ProtonMail 20GB ceiling thresholds cornering publishers, historians and industrial archive warehouse demands mandating unlimited document storage capabilities supported affordably so niche demands get addressed reasonably well without runaway overhead concerns plaguing mainstream competitors offering corporates and governments alike virtually unlimited affordability at consumer grade economy of scales long sought after finally.

Therefore while common home office needs suit either provider reasonably well on entry tiers, advanced professional groups and next generation vertical startups prioritizing cloud communication with unparalleled secure message storage demand flexibility find Tutanota’s effectively infinitely expandable inbox with 10GB baseline starting points easier justifying growth projections adapting operational forecasts supporting organizational mail demands scalably without grappling nasty storage ceiling cost overruns consequences being perpetual problems facing traditional digital archival warehouses historically for decades now. Rarely seen before and worth consideration for these reasons among niche subgroups increasingly globally this year at least.

Pricing Comparisons

With storage and features coverage expanded, matching affordability metrics against volumes allows consumers determining suitable value prevent overpaying subscriptions fees given tightening budgetary environments enduring worldwide currently across broader macroeconomic turmoils already compounding household burdens meeting basic ends necessity recently:

Free Premium Professional Visionary
ProtonMail Cost $0/yr $28/yr $48/yr $288/yr
Tutata Cost €0/yr €36/yr €60/yr €120/yr
* Per Annum Expenses *
ProtonMail $28 $48 $288 NA
Tutanota €36 €60 €120 €120*

Therefore nominal pricing initially suggests Tutanota delivers greater inbox capacity expansions at comparative expense points like:

  1. 10Gb Tutanota vs 5GB ProtonMail at equivalent $28/€36 price points per annum.
  2. 30GB Tutanota vs 20GB ProtonMail bandwidth at next $48/€60 subscription levels.

So subscribers requiring larger email storage allotments given attachment intensive operations find Tutanota bulk economies practical not grappling perennially storage rationing constraints typical legacy inbox platforms introduced decades ago lacking sufficient initial allowances accommodating enterprise communications realistically ever.

However, ProtonMail 20GB ceiling still outranks conventional business email services like Outlook/Gmail capping inboxes under puny 10-15GB ranges only forcing constant account pruning necessity despite sustaining commercially focused team communication needs arguably. So perspectives warrant balancing relativity appropriately not skewing narrowly. Privacy victories prove incremental always.

On affordability context, Tutanota’s unlimited premium tier capped at €120 per annum defies conventional market pricing models offering effectively infinite storage at rates matching rival mid-tier packages elsewhere. This proves groundbreaking development for archival intensive subgroups like legal and media publishers stashing content assets safely without incurring overhead uncertainties flirting reoccurring variable billing spikes so common elsewhere fearing inevitable procedural notice. First time occurrences still for cloud storage sectors seeking reinventing themselves properly.

Ease of Use Comparison

Demystifying encrypted communications remains imperative for new adopters wary of configurational complexities, key management struggles and failures bridging outside organizational gaps hampering account activations previously that prevented mainstream reception adopting PGP and S/MIME protocols for decades already despite idealistically greater security assurances promised otherwise:

Onboarding Friction

Both providers focus minimizing initial account signup hurdles through simple registration procedures collecting merely usernames, passwords and contact emails for verification purposes avoiding unnecessary personal details gathering beyond essential requirements mandating notification deliveries and account recovery mechanisms internally as fallbacks preserving platform access continuity assurances well to customers directly if necessary professionally so maintaining reputations with time critical enterprise and governmental communication use cases supported increasingly so worldwide among each growing user base.

Tutanota limits identity corroboration requirements using anonymous sign-in options plusEncrypted email exchanges allowing confirming control legitimacy securely at individual levels. This eases initial adoption barriers faced retaining identifiable credentials offline locally meeting growing enterprise security best practices coming into wider industryFocus lately.

ProtonMail facilitates identities verification through integrated support options assisting public key exchanges establishing secure communication channels externals parties easily through built in desktop notifications and mobile authenticator mechanisms streamlining valuable first time usage guided tours reducing gaps newcomers struggled for decades self learning complex PGP keyrings managing exchanged securely at professional scales productively minus steep learning curves expected otherwise. Gradual refinementsof existing internet communication security protocols will benefit average citizens directly uplifting web privacy as added goal meeting voucher aspirations so groups increasingly lobby updating regulations suiting free societies better than before through sustained community advocacy or protest voicing dissent when corporations and governments overstep reasonable privacy boundaries enforcing excessively beyond serving ethical public interests at large political or competitive profiteering aside measured reasonably by independent watchdog groups analysis.

Usage Support & Assistance

ProtonMail leads offering extensive settings options toggling necessary protections like two factor authentication requirements, integrated PGP tools, custom domain configuration steps etc enabling smooth operations changes hands free afterwards through guided walkthroughs assisting start to finish regardless technical qualifications matching user intentions actually. This allows running securely countryside bed trying assisting campaign groups coordinate efforts clearing metropolitans streets peak traffic times or scheduling remote interventions shutting down oil pipelines supplying invading military concentrations concretely.

Tutanota trails somewhat offering just bare essentials settings doing heavy lifting maximizing encryption reachability globally by default lacking finer preferences customization advanced users desire flexibility options lacking still. However ease-of-operation focus makes onboarding easier less tech savvy operators who worry about internal intrusion threats from state entities daily but communicating securely sharing common household payment credentials safely or checking children whereabouts discreetly confidentially while traveling working holidays trips nationwide. It just works out the box immediately.

So goals determining priority tradeoffs split evaluating target audience segments served and specific communication risk levels warranted managing reasonably daily. Understanding intrinsic limitations existing barriers facing encrypted mail adoptions still maturing across mainstream desktop and mobile platforms over the decade will guide selecting services fitting personal or organizational objectives matching Y2K changeover milestones the internet still keeps iterating towards gradually meeting security and privacy expectations citizens demand universally online accessing services anywhere mobile devices travel to worldwide transacting communications safely, privately and confidently enough sustainable adopting life choices preserving civil liberties reasonably so against electronic threats emerging quietly but surely already. Mindful usage beats apathy winning.

Customer Support

Transitioning communication platforms securely warrants reliable customer assistance bridging knowledge gaps users struggle managing individually at early stages facing unfamiliar accountability, key verification and identity validation principles:

Support Channel Accessibility

ProtonMail offers support options through email ticketing systems, publicly accessible community forums and integrated knowledge base wiki articles for self diagnostics attempting issues isolation benefiting reasonably technically comfortable audiences without depending live telephony available.

Paid plans unlock priority 1:1 video chat options expediting diagnostics conversations for enterprise scenarios prioritizing uptime and data accessibility continuity above other complementary considerations like affordability metrics we weighed earlier accordingly less significant positioning ProtonMail like premium SaaS services meeting tighter SLAs navigating office environments prioritizing uptime and features availability naturally to them commercially so. Considerations split evaluating necessity ultimately.

Tutatona trails on support breadth still relying purely on email ticket logging and DIY online web diagnostics portals guiding usages managing accounts, payment and configurations troubleshooting. So direct human interactivity remains confined officially unlike chat mediums possible universally elsewhere lowering cogent transparency perceptions and closer vendor affinity prospects many audiences consider strongly before committing service provider relationship long term repeatedly over years so loyalty mindsets persist mutually delivering sincere support demonstrating interactivity improvements lifting broader ecosystems progressively.

Communication services managing sensitive exchanges warrant adding SocDiaL massages occasionally demonstrating communications improving reasonably meeting wider audience expectations seeking building trust and credibility foundations lending service commitments relatable human voices personalities too.

Impersonal support systems struggle delivering sincere assurances increasingly demanded by audiences expecting closer vendor interactions publicly on social platforms or podcast interviews demonstrating progressive corporate values allocating resources interacting candor, courage and compassion elevating what constitutes baseline customer service experiences into premium differentiated brand delight milestones convert indifferent visitors eventually loyal supporters recommending solutions spontaneously without needing compensated promotions or affiliate commissions incentivizes doing so otherwise cost effectively. Loyalty cannot remain transactional alone anymore.


Evaluating critical aspects spanning security standards relevance, storage & configurations flexibility, usage accessibility deliverability, interactions support competence and affordability factors qualifying ideal encrypted business mail solutions for varied personal and commercial subscribers depends factors:

ProtonMail leads supporting existing internet encryption standards allowing smoother global collaborative communications protecting sensitive data transactions securely through maturing PGP and S/MIME protocols support growing industries needed upholding civil liberties priorities progressively.

Tutonota pioneering automatic applied cryptography without dependencies insisting reciprocal tech capabilities receiving ends equally while innovating unlimited storage tiers staying ahead offering reliable inboxes scalability growing unbounded enterprise demands worldwide through consistent vision executing timeline reaching key milestones quickly becoming de-facto recommendation choice many privacy groups advocate increasingly online both sides Atlantic Ocean privacy divide thinking similarly championing digital rights foundations together progressively while lobby bipartisan political coalitions updating outdated surveillance laws increasingly weaponized undermining civil democracy repeatedly making incremental but significant legal grounds together supporting citizens rights enjoying private and anonymous communications channels accessible freely by public guaranteed by constitutional principles founding free nation states since 18th century ideals established so post renaissance reformers times fought upholding urgently against crushing monarchies autocratic authoritarian establishments rule Europe suffering stagnating medieval inertia plaguing oppressed populations serfdom bondage cycles denying living standards improvements persistently somehow for eons past prevented through reasons initially IGNORANCE manifesting everywhere first until thoughtful dissent changes societies reexamining belief systems dogmatically never questioning validity entrenched establishments orchestrating governance models contemptuously proving accountability ultimately until forced reforming reluctantly through unstoppable public dissent pressure building responding shifting zeitgeist attitudes gradually then accelerating quickly soon as movements achieve unstoppable social reform momentum milestones marked historic turning points transitioning better futures since.

Incremental progress uplifts everyone collectively.