Skip to content
Home » WireGuard VS OpenVPN

WireGuard VS OpenVPN

  • by

Introduction

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) have become an essential tool for protecting your privacy and security online. VPNs work by encrypting your internet traffic and routing it through a server operated by the VPN provider. This hides your IP address, provides anonymity, and prevents snooping or tampering with your data.

However, the degree of security and privacy offered by a VPN depends largely on the protocol it uses. The VPN protocol governs how your device connects to the VPN server and determines factors like speed, encryption strength, and compatibility. Two of the most popular VPN tunneling protocols today are WireGuard and OpenVPN. Comparing them directly helps identify the advantages of each.

WireGuard represents an exciting modern VPN protocol employing state-of-the-art cryptography. It promises faster connections with simplified configurations using leaner code than legacy counterparts like OpenVPN. However OpenVPN enjoys widespread support across platforms thanks to its longevity and open-source foundations.

Evaluating both protocols across vital metrics like speed, security, and ease-of-use reveals the strengths and limitations inherently tied to these radically different technologies.

Background of WireGuard and OpenVPN

Before examining the two protocols head-to-head, understanding their origins provides helpful framing and context. Their divergent histories also inform the contemporary functionality built into WireGuard and OpenVPN implementations.

What is a VPN Protocol?

A VPN protocol refers to the underlying method and rules a VPN service uses to encapsulate your traffic then transport it securely between devices through encrypted tunnels across the internet. VPN protocols handle authentication plus data encryption and packaging processes before routing everything through intermediary servers and onto the public web transparently.

Leading protocols include OpenVPN, IKEv2/IPSec, L2TP, WireGuard and others. Providers typically deploy multiple protocols across servers to maximize version compatibility with diverse customer devices like Windows PCs, iPhones, Android tablets and Linux systems.

History of WireGuard

Born out of frustration with legacy business-focused VPN products, open-source hobbyist and security researcher Jason A. Donenfeld began work on an entirely new VPN protocol in 2015 aimed at consumer usability. Leveraging cutting-edge cryptography like Curve25519 for key exchange and ChaCha20 for encryption, Donenfeld crafted WireGuard as an extremely simple yet highly secure tunneling solution.

Favoring simplicity in both visual interface and back-end code complexity, WireGuard finally launched for the Linux kernel in 2018. Translation layers now enable WireGuard support across many operating systems from mobile to desktop platforms although native integration remains ongoing work-in-progress. Backed by buzz and academic review the protocol continues rapid open-source development as it challenges commercial alternatives.

History of OpenVPN

Evolving in the open-source community since 2001, OpenVPN helped pioneer the commercial VPN industry as we know it. Lead programmer James Yonan built on existing standards like SSL/TLS encryption to craft an encrypted tunneling system for securely connecting distant network locations across the public internet.

This revolutionary concept enabled remote users to privately access home or corporate networks through encryption powerful enough to guard sensitive data yet straightforward enough for novice users. OpenVPN soon became the preferred platform for many commercial solutions thanks to its balance of user-friendliness, strong cryptography and cross-platform availability. Continued open-source oversight keeps the platform updated against modern vulnerabilities.

Speed and Efficiency

Any VPN introduces some degree of connection overhead by tunneling through remote servers and encrypting all traffic. However measurable performance reduction varies drastically across protocols and implementations.

As a modern build engineered for efficiency from scratch, WireGuard benchmark testing confirms drastically faster speeds than OpenVPN thanks to cleaner code and lighter processing requirements. Real-world usage also reflects significant speed boosts from WireGuard compared to legacy VPN tunnels.

WireGuard Performance

Boasting commercial performance alongside experimental protocols like ZVPN, WireGuard easily ranks as one of the fastest VPN tunnel options thanks to technical design choices by Jason Donenfeld optimizing the protocol for both desktop and mobile deployments.

Utilizing only around 4,000 lines of code total, WireGuard massively reduces background bloat compared to the hundreds of thousands lines underpinning most VPN platforms. This compact efficiency allows WireGuard encrypted packets to transmit faster using less device resources. Minimizing cryptography to just three essential elements also streamlines processing needs for faster throughput.

Built on a lightweight principle model geared for high-performance devices and modern multi-core architecture, WireGuard handles encryption calculations faster using improved algorithms. Reduced latency and packet overhead also enhances connection speeds. Primitive cryptographic building blocks power maximum throughput optimized for the mass market rather than corporate tunnels.

OpenVPN Speed

While historically fast for its time thanks to SSL/TLS foundations, OpenVPN connections suffer noticeable speed losses in 2022 compared to leading protocols like WireGuard or IKEv2. Still utilizing relic encryption algorithms from the 1990s like BF-CBC, OpenVPN just can’t keep pace with modern innovations in cryptography and connection handling.

Nonetheless, OpenVPN technology still gets regular improvements through ongoing open-source development. New implementations integrate some faster ciphers like AES-GCM and enable multi-threading for better multi-core scalability across devices. Legacy technical debt however hampers peak speeds.

On Windows systems in particular, OpenVPN performance lags due to dependence on the Tap adapter virtual interface for tunneling. This adds considerable overhead compared to other protocols leveraging more efficient native VPN APIs built directly into newer operating systems like Windows 10 and Android.

Security and Privacy

Underpinning any VPN system lies its cryptographic engine securing traffic flowing through tunnels. Both WireGuard and OpenVPN build protection utilizing encryption, hashing and authentication across all connections. Comparing their differing approaches side-by-side showcases their respective security strengths.

WireGuard Security

Delivering state-of-the-art crypto primitives was Jason Donenfeld’s top priority for engineering WireGuard as the world’s most robust VPN tunnel solution. To that end WireGuard relies on just three lean algorithms:

  • Curve25519 handles public/private key generation and exchange for setting up the encrypted session
  • ChaCha20 provides symmetric encryption of session traffic using 256-bit keys
  • Poly1305 seals encrypted packets with authentication to confirm validity

Leveraging elliptical Curve25519 for session establishment allows perfect forward secrecy so intercepted keys can never be reversed to decrypt previous communications. Meanwhile fast ChaCha20 streaming cipher encryption protects packet contents without compromising speed through bulkier outdated ciphers. Each encryption layer gets sealed using Poly1305 integrity checks preventing tampering.

The careful minimalist combination of these three elements specifically chosen by Donenfeld provides state-of-the-art encryption with little room for vulnerabilities according to researchers. Backing these algorithms with constant open-source community code review also ensures optimal hardening against emerging attack vectors.

OpenVPN Encryption & Security

Supporting a wider array of legacy encryption options provides OpenVPN broader compatibility but also increases chances of weakened protection across outdated cipher selections. However OpenVPN does enable strong ciphers like AES-256 considered unbreakable by modern computing power.

Other available OpenVPN ciphers prove substantially weaker in contrast either using slimmer 128-bit keys (BF-CBC) susceptible to brute-force attacks or relying on discredited algorithms like ARC4. Though newer cipher implementations help, OpenVPN inherits a heavy legacy encryption burden compared to the uniform cutting-edge default encryption built into WireGuard.

OpenVPN configurations must also juggle far more moving parts across authentication mechanisms, pre-shared keys, digital certificates and encryption cipher combinations – each introducing potential weak links attackers could exploit through incorrectly matched components or information leaks exposing secret keys.

Compatibility and Support

Due to its considerably younger age, WireGuard so far lacks the extensive platform support built over decades across OpenVPN implementations. However WireGuard installation does provide superior ease-of-use and minimal configurations thanks to cleaner integrated code requiring no external modules or certificates.

WireGuard Compatibility

As an experimental new protocol, native WireGuard integration just recently landed across Linux, Android and Windows platforms with iOS/macOS adoption still pending (but available using third party apps). Nonetheless handy command line tools and GUI clients help enable compatibility across most devices.

The open-source development community continues actively working on WireGuard ports for many platforms however to yet match the ubiquity of OpenVPN. Initial focus centered on robust Linux support before expanding availability to other common systems. Despite starting from scratch in 2015, impressive WireGuard adaptations and performance already match VPN incumbents feature-for-feature in many regards.

OpenVPN Platform Support

Thanks to origins tracing back decades before smartphones, OpenVPN enjoys broad cross-platform support across countless devices and operating systems. Convenient installers exist for Windows, Linux distributions, iOS and Android alongside routers, NAS devices and more.

Dedicated apps providing OpenVPN connectivity also abound across mobile and desktop environments while third parties package the open-source code into countless commercial solutions. OpenVPN’s age and accessibility provides a long legacy advantage over upstart WireGuard in terms of baked-in system integration and pre-configured client accessibility.

Configuration Comparison

Configuring OpenVPN requires cobbling together various external components (encryption ciphers, auth chains, keys) and troubleshooting multiple potential failures between mismatched pieces. WireGuard eliminates these pain points by consolidating everything required internally using unified state-of-the-art cryptography and streamlined code requiring minimal user input.

Getting started with OpenVPN can prove daunting across platforms due to certificate authority setups, SSL/TLS handshakes and advanced configuration editing needed across servers and client devices. In contrast WireGuard simplifies connections by uniquely identifying peers through public/private key pairs for straightforward yet robust authentication and session encryption.

Conclusion

Reviewing the historical strengths of OpenVPN built over decades along with the modern concise efficiency of WireGuard highlights the advances made securing VPN architectures right alongside encryption technology itself. While OpenVPN still delivers proven and widely-compatible performance, upstart WireGuard outpaces it across speed, security and simplicity metrics – albeit with some platform compatibility tradeoffs.

For those choosing a VPN provider today that balances robust privacy protections with blistering connection speeds across devices, WireGuard makes an attractive protocol choice over dated OpenVPN technology in most use cases. However OpenVPN still owns an advantage in niche scenarios prioritizing certified implementations or aging hardware with finicky firmware.

Both open-source protocols will continue evolving over years to come thanks to public scrutiny and development contributing steady improvements. OpenVPN appears likely though to gradually cede market dominance to faster modern successors including WireGuard once platform support reaches parity. And WireGuard’s state-of-the-art underpinnings already provide ample speed and security today across all major platforms like Windows, Mac, iOS, Android and Linux for most personal and commercial VPN applications.

Tags: